by Lillian Csernica on January 22, 2015
About 2/3 of the new books I read, I read on my Kindle. When I’m finished, Amazon asks me for a star rating, then I get an email asking me for a review.
At the moment, the book I’ve started is so bad I doubt I’ll finish it. My sense of fairness compels me to read the whole thing just so if I do decide to review the book, I will have given it a thorough examination. I don’t have that much reading time these days, so I really don’t want to waste it on a book that reads little better than a second draft in desperate need of a copy editor. What slays me is there are already two sequels ready and waiting. <facepalm>
Let me throw this question out to all of you: In this brave new world of electronic self-publishing, what purpose are reviews really meant to serve? I know I may be coming rather late to this discussion, but this is what’s on my mind and I value your opinions.
Reviews are helpful to authors in terms of promotion. We all want to support each other, right? As a writer, I wouldn’t want to do any damage to a fellow writer’s sales by posting a negative review. It’s said that there’s no such thing as bad publicity, but I don’t know if I believe that. If the Internet loves you, it really loves you. If the Internet decides you should be run out of town on a rail, you’re in trouble.
Unfortunately, there are books out there with serious flaws. If I’m going to write a review, I have to tell the truth about my reading experience. I am a published novelist. I’ve published lots of short stories. I’ve been writing reviews for Tangent for a long time. That means I am qualified to evaluate the quality of a story’s plot, characters, setting, tone, theme, and pace. I know about magic systems and worldbuilding. Certain historical periods are quite familiar to me. Can’t say that I’m an expert, but I will give credit where credit is due even if I personally don’t care for the material at hand.
And yet I still feel conflicted. As a writer and a reader, there are times when I am outraged at the half-witted slop churned out by “authors” who really think somebody out there might be willing to pay good money to read it. I want to do all I can to support the “Caveat Emptor” school of thought when shopping for reading material online.
It does grind my gears to read reviews by people who either know nothing about the elements of good writing, or don’t know how to articulate what little knowledge they may have. Shameless gushing in a review makes me suspicious. Some people are not above stacking the deck in their favor. Here’s the problem: when an inexperienced and uneducated writer recruits his or her fellow writers whose skill level is pretty much at that same level, nobody is going to do any real good by making comments because they just don’t know what it takes to write a better story.
What do you think about all this?