H is for Historical Accuracy


 

by Lillian Csernica on April 8, 2013

f you’re going to write fiction or nonfiction that involves historical data, there are three ground rules that must be kept in mind.

1. Check your dates. Then check them again. Do not believe what you read unless you can confirm that information in at least three separate credible sources.

2. Spell the names/places/objects right. Please, please, for the love of all that’s literate, respect the language of the people you’re writing about and make sure you spell your historical terms as they should be spelled for the time period in which you’re writing.

           Example: My current novel is set in Japan. While I speak a certain amount of modern Japanese, I’ve had to learn the archaic words and grammatical forms appropriate to the Tokugawa Shogunate of 1867. That’s only half the battle. The other half is making their meanings clear to the reader by creating the right dramatic context.

3. Watch out for anachronisms. Dictionary.com says:

Noun

  1. A thing belonging or appropriate to a period other than that in which it exists, esp. a thing that is conspicuously old-fashioned.
  2. An act of attributing a custom, event, or object to a period to which it does not belong.

Edward III is often referred to as the Black Prince. Historians believe that nickname arose from either his black shield and armor, or his reputation among the French in Aquitaine thanks to him bringing a force of mercenaries through on a chevauchée designed to pillage the populace and destroy the farming. Important fact: the first reference to Edward III by that nickname occurred more than one hundred and fifty years after his death. If you’re writing a novel in the time of Edward II, the Black Prince’s father, you’d better refer to Edward III as Edward of Woodstock, which is where he was born. To call him the Black Prince would be anachronistic.

Am I belaboring this point? Damn right I am. As a reader and a writer of historical novels, I love history. Nothing makes me more furious than catching a mistake that could have been avoided with some proper research. Always write for your most intelligent readers. You respect them and they’ll respect you!

Historical accuracy.

If the hats aren’t ugly, you’re doing it wrong.

Advertisements

9 Comments

Filed under Blog challenges, fantasy, Fiction, Writing

9 responses to “H is for Historical Accuracy

  1. Richard Hallows

    Visiting from A2Z. Great advice – and not just for historical fiction – nothing gets a crime writer in more trouble than a lack of understanding of police procedure, uniform details or almost anything else. To be believable it must seem like the truth – so it must be accurate.
    http://richardhallows.blogspot.ie/

    Like

  2. Great post. Historical accuracy is important. It give the writer a lot more work to do, but in the end it’s worth it. Good luck with your Samurai story. Beard or no beard?

    Like

  3. I write for all readers, not just my most intelligent ones. But yes, get your facts straight. I’m an intelligent reader, and I appreciate facts.

    Like

  4. celticrob

    As someone who likes history, and studied it in university, I like to see historical accuracy.

    Blessings and Bear hugs!
    Bears Noting

    Like

  5. schillingklaus

    An omniscient narrator can be as anachronistic as he wants to.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s